|
The Case for Internet Procurement
Two key factors will fuel the shift to internet-based procurement.
First, business-to-business transactions conducted on the Internet
will continue to dwarf on-line business-to-consumer transactions.
Aberdeen Group research indicates that the value of business-to-business
transactions currently conducted on the internet is 10 times to
20 times greater than the value of on-line business-to-consumer
transactions. This gap will widen as more companies increase their
level of interaction with trading partners over the Internet.
The second - and more critical - factor that will drive the adoption
of internet procurement is that reengineering of purchasing processes
offers greater and more reliable benefits than does reengineering
of sales practices. The reason: procurement savings flow directly
to the bottom line. By contrast, the impact that sales have on profits
depends on the profit margin of the product or service being sold.
For example, a $5-million reduction in procurement costs increases
profits by a corresponding amount. Thus, even a company with a healthy
10% profit margin would need to increase sales by $50 million to
attain a similar boost in profits.
MRO procurement represents one of the biggest opportunities for
improvement and savings at most organizations. All told, U.S. businesses
spend $1.4 trillion on non-production goods and services each year,
according to estimates from Purchasing Magazine. Yet, until recently,
few organizations have had an effective strategy for managing and
controlling MRO expenditures. The lack of standard monitoring and
ordering procedures for such purchases can promote significant off-contract
or "maverick" purchasing. Maverick buys account for as much as 40%
of all MRO spending at some organizations, limiting an organization's
ability to effectively track MRO purchases; diminishing opportunities
to take advantage of pre-negotiated prices and volume discounts;
and, reducing leverage for future negotiations with suppliers under
contract.
In addition, MRO orders are primarily low-dollar purchases that
are comparatively costly to process - with order processing costs
often exceeding the price of the items being purchased - and constitute
an inordinate portion of a procurement professional's workload.
MRO purchasing is also one of the few operational areas that has
yet to be effectively automated. Traditional Material Requirements
Planning (MRP) and Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP II) systems
are focused on the acquisition and management of production materials.
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are designed for purchasing
professionals and require significant user training. Many of these
systems do not support comparative buying practices, parts substitution,
or supplier consolidation.
By comparison, Internet Procurement automation applications are
based on open, Internet Protocol (IP) technologies, incorporate
an intuitive user interface, require little or no user training,
and can be easily disseminated to multiple desktops via a corporate
intranet or extranet. Internet Procurement reengineers the purchasing
process by transferring order generation to the requisitioner level
while supporting the authorization hierarchies and business rules
established by the procurement department.
User organizations surveyed by Aberdeen identified
six key benefit streams used to justify acquisition of Internet
Procurement software:
-
Improve data gathering and reporting on MRO expenditures
-
Tighten control over off-contract or "maverick" purchasing
-
Enhance negotiation of reduced material and service costs provided
by the increased use of preferred suppliers
-
Lower procurement administration costs
-
Shorten requisition and order fulfillment cycles
-
Reassign procurement professionals to more strategic tasks,
such as supply chain management. User organizations also expected
Internet Procurement to provide support for supplier rationalization
initiatives and improved and/or reduced inventories
The above benefits can translate into significant dollar savings,
particularly for organizations that rein in off-contract spending.
Rerouting maverick purchases onto existing corporate agreements
enables organizations to take advantage of contract prices and volume
discounts previously negotiated with approved suppliers. Controlling
maverick purchases also provides buying organizations with increased
leverage to negotiate more favorable pricing and service arrangements
with suppliers, resulting in significant and recurring cost savings. |